×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 2 years old before posting.

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Demon Slayer Anime's Swordsmith Village Arc Previewed in Video


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SP654



Joined: 07 Apr 2020
Posts: 263
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 9:27 am Reply with quote
Still haven't announce a release date
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaxSouth



Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 1363
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 9:38 am Reply with quote
Why did the manga end only after four years?

Was it a failure in terms of sales towards the end?

Normally, successful projects like this are run for many years, sometimes even for more than a decade. And they do not become bad or dragged just because they are long.

E.g. One Piece and Naruto had the main story planned for many years ahead of writing/drawing the chapters, they were not invented on the spot just to prolong the mangas. (Unlike Bleach where "plot" of a team member being kidnapped is just endlessly repeated and beaten to death, which had a drastic consequence for sales of the manga as it was obviously aimlessly dragged without any actual thought behind this.)

Or was it the author's actual intent to make this story relatively short?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
garfield15



Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1517
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 9:52 am Reply with quote
MaxSouth wrote:

Or was it the author's actual intent to make this story relatively short?

It's this. The mangaka knew where it was supposed to end and it ended there.

Also when the anime really started blowing up, the manga was entering it's final arc anyway
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mushrinku



Joined: 09 Mar 2022
Posts: 75
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:22 am Reply with quote
MaxSouth wrote:
Why did the manga end only after four years?

Was it a failure in terms of sales towards the end?

Normally, successful projects like this are run for many years, sometimes even for more than a decade. And they do not become bad or dragged just because they are long.

E.g. One Piece and Naruto had the main story planned for many years ahead of writing/drawing the chapters, they were not invented on the spot just to prolong the mangas. (Unlike Bleach where "plot" of a team member being kidnapped is just endlessly repeated and beaten to death, which had a drastic consequence for sales of the manga as it was obviously aimlessly dragged without any actual thought behind this.)

Or was it the author's actual intent to make this story relatively short?


crazy how you put naruto and " a story that was planned for many years ahead and not invented on the spot" on the same sentence, and gives it as an example for a story that did not become bad.
naruto's last arc was horrible writing. the ending was garbage. in fact half way into part 2 of the manga the story started to go down hill, the last arc was just the peak of its bad writing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Unculturedman



Joined: 01 Apr 2022
Posts: 57
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 12:12 pm Reply with quote
Mushrinku wrote:
MaxSouth wrote:
Why did the manga end only after four years?

Was it a failure in terms of sales towards the end?

Normally, successful projects like this are run for many years, sometimes even for more than a decade. And they do not become bad or dragged just because they are long.

E.g. One Piece and Naruto had the main story planned for many years ahead of writing/drawing the chapters, they were not invented on the spot just to prolong the mangas. (Unlike Bleach where "plot" of a team member being kidnapped is just endlessly repeated and beaten to death, which had a drastic consequence for sales of the manga as it was obviously aimlessly dragged without any actual thought behind this.)

Or was it the author's actual intent to make this story relatively short?


crazy how you put naruto and " a story that was planned for many years ahead and not invented on the spot" on the same sentence, and gives it as an example for a story that did not become bad.
naruto's last arc was horrible writing. the ending was garbage. in fact half way into part 2 of the manga the story started to go down hill, the last arc was just the peak of its bad writing.


Ridiculous. It’s hilarious to me how so many people still jump on a Naruto hate bandwagon in 2022 after years of time to understand the story. While I wouldn’t call the final arc a masterpiece or thoroughly planned because there are numerous flaws and missed opportunities, it certainly was not horrible. The ending is an all time favorite of mine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lossthief
ANN Reviewer


Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 1398
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 12:21 pm Reply with quote
MaxSouth wrote:
Why did the manga end only after four years?

Was it a failure in terms of sales towards the end?

Nope. While Demon Slayer wasn't a huge hit before the anime it was selling just fine. It just wasn't built to run indefinitely and had already started its final arc around the time the anime released and sales started exploding. They could have theoretically extended it - introduce new enemies or a threat bigger than Muzan or something - but I think the creator and everyone involved recognized that would just drag it out too long, so they finished it up at just over 200 chapters. I think the era of super-long running shonen jump hits is mostly over, One Piece notwithstanding. Nowadays editorial - and the actual manga creators - seem to value the prospect of ending a series when it's ready instead of dragging it out endlessly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jdnation



Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 2007
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 1:10 pm Reply with quote
I prefer the trend of shorter series and authors knowing when to end a series and keeping it strong throughout its run.

Look on the bright side, if something blows up and becomes really big, there are always other opportunities to capitalize on that with spin-offs and original short stories, original OVAs and films that can be just as good in the same universe leveraging its other cast members and none of that dilutes the strength of the original source material.

If the author decides there was other untapped potential there, they can always come back to do a few more original stories.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KarlFranz



Joined: 17 Jun 2019
Posts: 180
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 1:47 pm Reply with quote
Unculturedman wrote:
Mushrinku wrote:
MaxSouth wrote:
Why did the manga end only after four years?

Was it a failure in terms of sales towards the end?

Normally, successful projects like this are run for many years, sometimes even for more than a decade. And they do not become bad or dragged just because they are long.

E.g. One Piece and Naruto had the main story planned for many years ahead of writing/drawing the chapters, they were not invented on the spot just to prolong the mangas. (Unlike Bleach where "plot" of a team member being kidnapped is just endlessly repeated and beaten to death, which had a drastic consequence for sales of the manga as it was obviously aimlessly dragged without any actual thought behind this.)

Or was it the author's actual intent to make this story relatively short?


crazy how you put naruto and " a story that was planned for many years ahead and not invented on the spot" on the same sentence, and gives it as an example for a story that did not become bad.
naruto's last arc was horrible writing. the ending was garbage. in fact half way into part 2 of the manga the story started to go down hill, the last arc was just the peak of its bad writing.


Ridiculous. It’s hilarious to me how so many people still jump on a Naruto hate bandwagon in 2022 after years of time to understand the story. While I wouldn’t call the final arc a masterpiece or thoroughly planned because there are numerous flaws and missed opportunities, it certainly was not horrible. The ending is an all time favorite of mine.


Yeah, Kaguya totally has been set up as the final boss. Totally not because Kishimoto accidentally made Madara too strong so he had to make another villain to upstate Madara. Oh and let not forget all the story themes and messages that got toss aside along the way and how most side characters got sidelined (who is Tenten anyway?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PseudoFiction



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 95
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 3:50 pm Reply with quote
MaxSouth wrote:
Why did the manga end only after four years?

Was it a failure in terms of sales towards the end?

Normally, successful projects like this are run for many years, sometimes even for more than a decade. And they do not become bad or dragged just because they are long.

E.g. One Piece and Naruto had the main story planned for many years ahead of writing/drawing the chapters, they were not invented on the spot just to prolong the mangas. (Unlike Bleach where "plot" of a team member being kidnapped is just endlessly repeated and beaten to death, which had a drastic consequence for sales of the manga as it was obviously aimlessly dragged without any actual thought behind this.)

Or was it the author's actual intent to make this story relatively short?


Man.. I'd love to known what the main story of One Piece is, since every arc give 50 new characters to remember then mostly discarded when they move to the next island.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpiritSmoocher



Joined: 06 Mar 2021
Posts: 182
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 4:16 pm Reply with quote
Glad Ufotable is quickly rolling out seasons as I am impatient. We are rolling quickly towards the finale.

As for people saying Demon Slayer manga was a failure, be aware if you are a decently long running battle shonen in Weekly Shonen Jump, you are more or less at the top of the food chain for series. Jump is a huge brand in japan and like in every Family Mart. You are nearly guaranteed a decently competent studio to handle your production. Only slip up i think was tokyo ghoul re but I don't think it is that bad.

Ufotable really wasn't considering taking that big of a risk. If they wanted to take risks, they would try to adapt a relatively obscure series from Kadokawa.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BadNewsBlues



Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 5967
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 4:39 pm Reply with quote
KarlFranz wrote:


Yeah, Kaguya totally has been set up as the final boss. Totally not because Kishimoto accidentally made Madara too strong so he had to make another villain to upstate Madara.


Which was solved by dusting off Kaguya who despite what people think wasn’t created in part 2 as she was mentioned/referred to all the way back in part 1. Who was even more stronger than Madara and couldn’t be defeated under practical circumstances.


KarlFranz wrote:

Oh and let not forget all the story themes and messages that got toss aside along the way and how most side characters got sidelined (who is Tenten anyway?)


I mean let’s not pretend that TenTen ever had as much relevance and importance as Neji & Lee. Like the only memorable thing she did was get squashed off screen by Temari who later joined her village years later. While it is true that Naruto did undercut’s it’s supporting characters by barely using them in the story. It’s been demonstrated that trying to give your supporting characters too much focus in parts of the story where they’re not needed can also be an issue as Bleach infamously demonstrated numerous times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZiharkXVI



Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 364
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 5:07 pm Reply with quote
lossthief wrote:
MaxSouth wrote:
Why did the manga end only after four years?

Was it a failure in terms of sales towards the end?

Nope. While Demon Slayer wasn't a huge hit before the anime it was selling just fine. It just wasn't built to run indefinitely and had already started its final arc around the time the anime released and sales started exploding. They could have theoretically extended it - introduce new enemies or a threat bigger than Muzan or something - but I think the creator and everyone involved recognized that would just drag it out too long, so they finished it up at just over 200 chapters. I think the era of super-long running shonen jump hits is mostly over, One Piece notwithstanding. Nowadays editorial - and the actual manga creators - seem to value the prospect of ending a series when it's ready instead of dragging it out endlessly.


It's for the best. I can tell when authors are padding - story ends up suffering and half the time written by committee (uninspired).

Anyways can't wait for the next season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpiritSmoocher



Joined: 06 Mar 2021
Posts: 182
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 5:10 pm Reply with quote
lossthief wrote:
I think the era of super-long running shonen jump hits is mostly over, One Piece notwithstanding. Nowadays editorial - and the actual manga creators - seem to value the prospect of ending a series when it's ready instead of dragging it out endlessly.


It is to maximize profits. Mugen Train and JJK 0 has shown publishers that a new hype series will make quick money over long running titans like Naruto, One Piece, Gundam. There is just less you need to be caught up on. Anime will lose popularity over the years which is why even successful authors are opting to go for a new series instead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lossthief
ANN Reviewer


Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 1398
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 5:32 pm Reply with quote
SpiritSmoocher wrote:
lossthief wrote:
I think the era of super-long running shonen jump hits is mostly over, One Piece notwithstanding. Nowadays editorial - and the actual manga creators - seem to value the prospect of ending a series when it's ready instead of dragging it out endlessly.


It is to maximize profits. Mugen Train and JJK 0 has shown publishers that a new hype series will make quick money over long running titans like Naruto, One Piece, Gundam. There is just less you need to be caught up on. Anime will lose popularity over the years which is why even successful authors are opting to go for a new series instead.


That's not really "maximizing profits" so much as it's prioritizing short-term profits over long term. JJK and Demon Slayer have certain maid bank, DS especially, but their lifetime sales are still less than half of One Piece's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpiritSmoocher



Joined: 06 Mar 2021
Posts: 182
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 5:35 pm Reply with quote
lossthief wrote:


That's not really "maximizing profits" so much as it's prioritizing short-term profits over long term. JJK and Demon Slayer have certain maid bank, DS especially, but their lifetime sales are still less than half of One Piece's.


For sure lifetime of JJK and Demon Slayer will probably never match that of One Piece. What I am saying is it is unlikely for them to get another One Piece which is why they are just riding on new hit show after new hit show.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group